deutschland series
praeambel
hanns-martin schleyer
juergen ponto
helmut kohl
horst herold
adelheid schulz

artist series
anna balint
beate zurwehme
bela emerson
christian schroeder
dan flavin
daniel birnbaum
dr. matze schmidt
egon eiermann
gruppe spur (1)
gruppe spur (2)
joachim kluge
jorgen sparwasser
justice yeldham
lasse-marc riek
manfred peckl
marc-oliver schürmann
marina abramovich
martin kippenberger
martin wagner
modeselector
monochrom
ovo
ryfylke
simon schaefer
small dogs army
stella friedrichs
stroem
thomas draschan
thomas orban
zampa di leone




In the media theory debate of henriette herkules & hektor often the speech was of the fact that "media" an indistinct, insufficiently outlined term was. In the meantime I am encountered a definition suggestion of Hartmut Winkler, which is clear with first vintages immediately, when long thinking however further questions raise. Here an attempt to classify the term historically: The term "medium" does not only originate from the physics 19. Century and is not only closely with (scientifically overhauled) the concept of the ether linked - much more near e.g. at the beginning of the past century the developed theory of the magnetism lies. See in addition strong also to Mesmers innovative, work "mass magnetism and Hypermnesie" oriented at LeBon. The term of the ether in metaphorical form only for the radio and other radio techniques used, e.g. if of it the speech is, something of "over the ether to send". This conception exists implicitly also in the communication-scientific model of the medium as medium range between transmitters and receivers of a message, like it to at the beginning 20. Century in different variants (among other things in the Strukturalismus, e.g.. with Jakobson, and in angloamerikanischen linguistics and semiotic, e.g. with Richards) one formulated. The computer culture has a comparatively precise term of "medium" and/or. "media" in the sense of materially solid memory locked in itself and leaders, who of vintage -, writing and control hardware are uncoupled, and/or material components of the latters form. Too German: A CD blank is a medium, a CD drive assembly not and a computer already not at all. A semiconductor is a medium, a chip however not. Just as little is, in contrast to the ether model, one transmit-strains a medium - the radio waves however already (similarly the animal magnetism). The word medium theory decreases/goes back on McLuhan, even if the term of the "medium" is to be found in the sense of communication and an agricultural engineering already in former times, e.g. in Kracauers "theory of the film" from 1960 to. Unfortunately McLuhan contributed rather to the confusion, because to the differentiation of the term, by he e.g.. electrical light and hand-held weapons as media analyze. "medium" is for McLuhan thus to a large extent synonymously with forms of the Telefonie generally, and by it only with the restriction is provided that it describes technology as Extension of human abilities. - Cronenbergs "Crash" e.g. is, a practical Meditation of this theory thought very far. The question is however, in what respect this does not apply to all technology and medium theory in this sense a culture history of the technology is simple. Into this direction contemporary German media research seems, like it e.g.. at the Karlsruher center for art and medium technology is operated to tend. Second kind of the medium theory and research understands media literally as nets in the sense of Shannons communication theory and analyzes the cultural implications of conductive strips, electrical recording techniques and circuits. This applies to the medium science proclaimed by Friedrich Kittler and its pupils in and the 90's 80's. However in the long run also it metonymisiert the term of the medium, if it speaks e.g. of radio and computer as media, and not only from radio waves and semiconductors. A third kind of the media research understands "medium" simply as contraction for "new medium". Into the 1960er its main object was radio and film, into the 1970er and 80's television and video, into the 1990er years computers and InterNet. This medium science firmiert as general spirit-scientific edge and experimental discipline, which accommodate everything, which falls from the raster of establish spirit and art-scientific disciplines. Similar applies to "media art" in relation to contemporary exhibition art. A fourth kind of the media research is derived from third: From critical discontent of describing only temporarly that in each case "new" it seeks from its research field a general term of the medium and their discipline to win. In contrast to the second type of the medium science it does not go out thus quasi strukturalistisch with a technical term of the information, the channel and the medium, in order to derive from it concrete observations too, but begins phenomenologically with the observation one as "media" of first only heuristically outlined field, in order to derive from it terms. For this I count also Winklers medium science and its suggestion on a definition of the term "medium". With McLuhan it agrees therein, media as technical to formally understand and tendentious invisibly [ thus acquired by humans as the second nature ] in contrast to McLuhan however limits it them to symbolic and kommunikative techniques. Differently than one at Shannon oriented "hard" medium science breaks through it the transceiver pattern in favor of the term "yield" cross-linking, the consideration of "fluids practices" to a certain extent the circle between practices and resignation, hermeneutischen over bare "resignation" in the sense of products and technology outside, and the conception. [ also the Luhmann postulate of the medium as exchange of messages between members of a system contradicts. ] Winklers medium term is discretely, exclusive - and does not include therefore also such definitions of the medium, which is metonymisch in the sense of the second medium science, thus e.g. the medium as institution. (the disadvantage here is a Unschaerfe of the word Metonymie: What is meant, if of the medium radio is the speech? Radio transmission or transmitter bureaucracies? (see Luhmann "of the public legal articles of association of the society, Frankfurt 1999) problematic remains also the distinction by media and indications and/or plotting systems. Winklers text uses both terms parallel, without became clear, as exactly indications and/or plotting systems would be to be differentiated from media to. Which requirement does medium science have, even if it is indication science at the same time? Would it would thus step to the place of the semiotic, have to be future then e.g. linguistics a Unterdisziplin of the net science? permits actually only the conclusion: more grether exists, however into psychose (which would be also only too human). correctly actually never the whole I of must urgent grether speaking the people sought out, which we now asked? those cannot investigate simply I, I mad supersow for example can that, have also much to time of my life with piesacken of local politicians and other schwachkoeppen during my daily paper spent I know stop that one gets information only if one penetriert the people verbal. since however most more medienkunstblaeser only on hot air and contact-poor play psychos are, which yield-send yourself behind screens hide, wundert's nevertheless not that those "do not smell" times info. paths. best example is lutschlovink (SAB InterNet and CO... lettrescheisse): times the replication looks on its ventures from pit schultz and then the bepisste reaction of this pseudo. there white one nevertheless, as stupidly, putridly and established after worst sense all this is (except pit natural, because that is more clever and checks up everything). the other one asks remains further unanswered: why does it make now son geschiss around the net science, wenns it nevertheless obviously three years long did not interest? because it do not wave nachfragerei the no more borne can be waste-paper basket pours over before verkappter fan post office rather reinhold. freely after Mr. cutters: "the old pneumatic delivery reinhold play: I special pneumatic delivery, you sachs reinhold "usf. the venture capitalist dares now which on one's own, after he obligation-free-swam himself academically I believes the fact that I do not want to become acquainted with that meanwhile any longer I find so with restraint (if er's was real) repulsively infantil. ever now poor isolated sow dreamed once about the own chair and became only with auftragsmaloche beunfriedigt. can I well understand the fact that one then gladly also times neurotisiert. aba wade yourself nich is, datt is smooth nich, like one with us in the district so beautifully sacht. special I to you well clearly, one could this explanation on netzwissenschaft.org and sonstwo to publish schlieszlich supports itself by it (partially) in any case: transparency! the socialmost democratic of all requirements! our statement no copyright infringement to have committed and we times, which does not inquire for a reaction to comes if more grether existed, can we should wait for niemandens copyrights have also hurt which are with the rights of exploitation? those asks holds I for urgent we nothing changed! we have also never - although we did not know anything about the identity gs - doubted that avatar the creator was more grether the only mutation is gentleman more buettner to attribute, in a half artistic, half unconscious act a few bildchen in the data tangle lost, so that e.g. in the imprint this mad computer design of max headroom II. did not appear alias more grether however that was an omission, which showed, how heavily our pain weighed and paffi nueppel to the topic publish then can it gladly try, accurately, to firstride apropos: still none answer... I suggest, we establish behind the chain saw * wiki to the topic "gehts around the anti- neoistische countering revolution wet here" and ask: I think anyway straight about a communist manifesto. science term and like Dr. more grether it with feet steps ". jep, Dr. g as inszenator more irrationally theorieverschwurbelung, or like a defector from distribution state of emergency that principal to the risk became an introduction wissenschaftl. bg darmstadt 2006, at the latest! it gladly times with the help of its protofaschistoiden view of science to disprove try evenly wasn coincidence and Thursday the letter in Wiesbaden sent one could smoothly mine, it concern a conspiracy. Dr. is more grther to alive! I yesterday spoke with him and he have also to be side again on-line! yes, for Thursday! Dear Sir, since in our University of information system only the current coworkers are specified, does not let himself be answered your question so easily. If you know, in which specialist area or Institut Mr. Grether was possibly active, I would recommend to you to turn directly there. Please you let it know me, if I can be further helpful you. With best greetings it interests Ladies and Gentlemen, me whether at the university Frankfurt places a training order or an other in the last years a Dr. reinhold more grether than scientific coworker or lecturer had thank you and friendly greets member in vereind befriended and promoters j.w.g. - University of Dear Mr. Sch., I its text politics-digitally found and tightens that it is the recent contribution, in which Dr. Grether to word comes. I do not know whether you pursued the debates over its whereabouts on the mailing list pneumatic delivery, but Mr. Grether is most in this sense "wanted". So also of mir.Ich attain a doctorate over net art and need urgently contact for scientific reasons. I tried to reach Mr. Grether already personally and by means of the normal, papiernen post office way. Without success. Perhaps you have an idea. There I am with my latin at the end, became him nevertheless over the condition of its old project interviewen. Owing to in advance and cordial greetings Dear Mr. Sparwasser, Mr. Dr. Grether was active in the SS 2002 as a guest professor at the Intitut for applied theatre science. Its seminars were theatres and InterNet the digital arena. Yours sincerely hello Mr. Weiss, unfortunately I can help you also. I met Grether after the interview still times in Konstanz. But afterwards it withdrew itself and was telephone and by Mail not to be achieved. To that extent its statement is applicable on netzwissenschaft.de that it is not to be contacted, from my experience. Why, I do not know also. Sorry! Greeting - Peter Sch. a pneumatic delivery is a pneumatic delivery is a pneumatic delivery. it is interesting that the gentleman more grether since its disappear now in theatres made, and no longer in superordinate net sciences that is a proto anale involution - > retreat the applied the net theatre science by the net sciences into and the topics, to which reported, are not times its own [ google - > "the digital arena" gabs already without more grether ], but that have themselves there on knocked against a wheel an already wedged which in addition, only one metaphor for an endless linklisted are, which are significantly one getriebenheit, their ursaschen not in the net to be found have might I suggest, we make a digital analysis, in application of the net sciences on the psychoanalyse, struktural reversibly like the fetischistische object relationship (those the net sciences for more grether also are) as psychoanalyse of the net science whereby that rather the psychopathologie virtual have someone coincidental one wissneschaftsbegriff for me is oh like that; we should not forget, these discussions un-oeffenlich, i.e. ausschlieszlich in the net to lead permit actually only the conclusion: more grether exists, however into psychose (which would be also only too human). correctly actually never the whole I must urgent grether of speaking the people sought out, which we now asked? those cannot investigate simply I, to savings water, I mad supersow for example can that, have also much time of my life with piesacken of half artists and other schwachkoeppen with my gallery spent I know stop that one works [ and information is works ] gets only if one penetriert the people verbal. since however most more medienkunstselbstblaeser only on hot air and contact-poor play psychos are, which yield-send yourself behind screens hide [ "girls in mini skirts are open systems" ], wound RTS nevertheless not that those "do not smell" times the info. paths. best example is lutschfink [ SAB, InterNet and CO-lettrescheisze ]: times the replication looks on its ventures from pit schultz and then the bepisste reaction of this pseudo. there white one nevertheless, as stupidly, putridly and established after worst sense all this is [ except pit natural, because that is more clever and checks up everything ]. Dr. was more grether at the specialist area for newer philologies and/or theatre and medium science actively for further information concerning its topics of the seminar would probably be very grateful I. I passed their inquiry on to the responsible specialist area 10 (newer philologies). Please you expect an answer from there. instead of entbergen thus sparebuilt (both A la more heidegger) - if one a house does not have, but one to build wants, brauchts in the time of the building a spare house which is not already there, made calls one also facts to create. dasz it, in this case exemplary Stefan beck, flees takes I also on however escape is no negative. eskapismus perhaps already think only, dasz eskapistische movements always the review on that need, about which or better from where they flee whereby are not clear, dasz all always clear vectors have mueszte. if in erichtung one flees, then I read that first as simple movement the Stefan am me as a producer all the same I think, he tried beyond sociopolitical movements somewhat social arrange - typical art-shits evenly, with the chance to the realization I reads as marginalisierung and simultaneous offer, with the biszchen money, which he e.g.. from the museum for its work gets, mixed with the time of the partizipientinnen (hautpsaechlich also of money consists), something ' other one ' to make thus makes it, for who exemplary beck, which makes for each baker in the Sunday afternoon, he makes spare time I holds its experiences within this range for einigermaszen valuable him only to be dissen is desert. also your perspective does not go, scum RK blogwar.org is nearly personifizierend. of it tries I also into divides too emanzipieren. only if it you flogs - and feels you you flogged around it? - can use one self-defence. preventive impacts in the face are against the code of the also minimum respect. hahaha genius! you acres truly deranged. the best thing i have seas all day and i only just got UP sorry i don't have 21tb OF space lying around.
->->subjektivation